Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
(800) 937-3880
SELL

Lot #43
Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln's response in the famous tort law conversion case Johnstone v. Weedman

This lot has closed

Estimate: $2000+
Sell a Similar Item?
Share:  

Description

Lincoln's response in the famous tort law conversion case Johnstone v. Weedman

ADS, signed "Moore & Lincoln p.d.," one page, 7.75 x 4.5, no date. A portion of the demurrer in the case of Andrew Johnstone v. John Weedman, in which attorneys Abraham Lincoln and Clifton H. Moore defended Mr. Weedman in the DeWitt County Circuit Court. In need of adequate representation, John Weedman availed himself of the services of attorney Abraham Lincoln. Weedman found himself on the defendant's side of a civil complaint when Andrew Johnstone sought damages from the man he accused of having killed his horse. Weedman was paid $1 a month by Johnstone to feed and pasture his steed when one day, without permission from the horse's owner, Weedman rode the animal a distance of 15 miles. A few hours later, it was dead. In a civil suit for what amounts today as the wrongful taking of another's property (known as 'conversion' at common law), Johnstone sought $300 in damages. Abraham Lincoln pled on behalf of his client that the horse's death was not caused by its being ridden, but instead resulted from disease. Overwhelmingly convinced by the future president's argument, the jury found Weedman not guilty. The offered document is part of the answer to the plaintiff's complaint submitted to the court by Lincoln—a demurrer, in fact—whereby the defendant admitted the facts asserted by the plaintiff, but maintained that, for said facts, the pleading could not be sustained. Lincoln writes: "And as to the second and third counts of said declaration & each of them the defendant says action non because he says that said counts and the matters & things therein contained in manner & form as the same are therein stated and set forth are not sufficient in law for the said plaintiff to have and maintain his action thereof against him, and this he is ready to verify—wherefore he prays judgment &c." Lincoln's cursive writing remains strong and completely legible. As was required by the court's rules, Johnstone's attorney, Wells Colton, signed his name ("Colton") below Lincoln's script. In fine condition, with a light spot over the "Mo" of "Moore." Today, Johnstone v. Weedman is a staple of most law books on civil suits in tort. When Johnstone later appealed the case before the Illinois Supreme Court, the High Court affirmed the former ruling, as it too found convincing Lincoln's argument that riding the horse was not a 'conversion' for which damages could be recovered.

Auction Info

  • Auction Title: Fine Autographs and Artifacts
  • Dates: #545 - Ended February 06, 2019





This item is Pre-Certified by PSA/DNA
Buy a third-party letter of authenticity for $250.00

*This item has been pre-certified by a trusted third-party authentication service, and by placing a bid on this item, you agree to accept the opinion of this authentication service. If you wish to have an opinion rendered by a different authenticator of your choosing, you must do so prior to your placing of any bid. RR Auction is not responsible for differing opinions submitted 30 days after the date of the sale.